<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Having Only One Income Stream Is Not Enough&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/</link>
	<description>Life is what you make it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Fent</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-48564</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Fent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-48564</guid>
		<description>Almost everyone that earnsan income on the internet (even the millionaires) do so through affiliate marketing. Being successful in affiliate marketing involves applying the formula that makes other affiliate marketers successful. For instance, autoblogging. Autoblogging is one of the least well-known forms of making money online for quite some time... mainly because it&#039;s quite difficult to make a good auto-blog. Yet, when done right, it can provide you with a constant passive income with the only real work required being the setting up process. Video Marketing, and several other marketing strategies are all designed to drive traffic to your site, can be incorporated steadily in order to raise the position your site appears in the SERPs when someone searches for a term related to your site. And yet, even this can be totally automated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost everyone that earnsan income on the internet (even the millionaires) do so through affiliate marketing. Being successful in affiliate marketing involves applying the formula that makes other affiliate marketers successful. For instance, autoblogging. Autoblogging is one of the least well-known forms of making money online for quite some time&#8230; mainly because it&#8217;s quite difficult to make a good auto-blog. Yet, when done right, it can provide you with a constant passive income with the only real work required being the setting up process. Video Marketing, and several other marketing strategies are all designed to drive traffic to your site, can be incorporated steadily in order to raise the position your site appears in the SERPs when someone searches for a term related to your site. And yet, even this can be totally automated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickW</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-47432</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-47432</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. Your primary job as an early retiree/nomad is to enjoy your life and see the world. Hence the vast majority of the funds should be a very fixed asset allocation with once-a-year rebalance. The small beat-the-market fund is there for your intellectual challenge and for generating lunch money. My point is that you need to do something other than pure relaxation because without contrast, even pure relaxation can become bland. That &quot;something&quot; can be fundamental analysis, writing automated trading programs, writing blogs, teaching English, teaching dancing, or whatever engages you, but the task&#039;s number one criterion is portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. Your primary job as an early retiree/nomad is to enjoy your life and see the world. Hence the vast majority of the funds should be a very fixed asset allocation with once-a-year rebalance. The small beat-the-market fund is there for your intellectual challenge and for generating lunch money. My point is that you need to do something other than pure relaxation because without contrast, even pure relaxation can become bland. That &#8220;something&#8221; can be fundamental analysis, writing automated trading programs, writing blogs, teaching English, teaching dancing, or whatever engages you, but the task&#8217;s number one criterion is portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-47426</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-47426</guid>
		<description>Nope, I don&#039;t advocate constant monitoring and asset reallocation or frequent portfolio turnover for nomads. We can use fixed rules such as the various ratios to decide the relative focus between stocks and bond. We shouldn&#039;t aim to be exactly right every time. We just need to be right 60% to beat the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I don&#8217;t advocate constant monitoring and asset reallocation or frequent portfolio turnover for nomads. We can use fixed rules such as the various ratios to decide the relative focus between stocks and bond. We shouldn&#8217;t aim to be exactly right every time. We just need to be right 60% to beat the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickW</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-47416</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-47416</guid>
		<description>Sunny, let&#039;s segregate the invest to match the market fund with the invest to beat the market fund. Though I don&#039;t recall exactly which replies of yours indicated such, but I believe that you advocated the same approach -- have the vast majority of your funds in a sensible portfolio with asset allocation based on some sensible asset allocation such as the permanent portfolio or the couch potato portfolio. The invest to beat the market portfolio should be invested based on your ability to identify alpha, however that is achieved through fundamental analysis or through technical or statistical analysis. Heck, if everybody subscribed to the strong form of EMH, then security prices wouldn&#039;t move much.

The ability and the time required to identify alpha through fundamental analysis, unfortunately, is not trivial. To analyze a single small-cap company from scratch based on financial statements takes the order of double to low triple digit hours. You can do this as full-time employment, but to do this as a side job would yield perhaps two investment opportunities every two months, and that&#039;s only if you diligently applied yourself outside of work by putting in an extra 20 hours every week,and if the market eventually catches up with your assessment, and if your investment portfolio can sustain the draw downs while the market makes up its mind about your ability to identify alpha.

The thing with most small businesses is that they are not portable, and they require quite a bit of marketing, two traits that make them not suitable for a wannabe nomad. The first is self explanatory enough. The second means that instead of just kissing one miserable boss&#039;s ass, now you have to kiss everyone&#039;s ass because public opinion has a real impact on your business&#039;s ability to prosper. 

For me, the second part of the portfolio is both an intellectual pursuit and a way to generate some spending money. I can retire now on the first part of my portfolio, but realistically, what the heck am I going to do all day lying in a hammock on a beach? While I&#039;m 100% certain that the first 6 months of lying in a hammock will be pure bliss, I&#039;m not so sure about what will happen after the first 6 months. I gave early retirement a try 4 years ago by taking off for 4 months. I can say without reservation that the day I walked out of work, I felt about 20 pounds lighter simply because all the deadlines, all the politics, and all the BS became meaningless to me, but after about 6 weeks of sitting around, despite spending 4 hours a day studying for the CFA, I still felt that I wasn&#039;t entirely fulfilled despite having the MBA to look forward to by the autumn of that year.

That experiment got me thinking what will I do if I were to take early retirement. Yes, chasing multiples of Asian female hotness will take up 4 hours a day for sure. Heck, just swapping SIM cards to manage the multiples of Asian girlfriends will take an hour, but what about the rest of the the day? Work out at the gym for 2-3 hours, get a massage to relax the overworked muscles, one hour. OK, I guess that is a full work day. Then by the the time evening rolled around, I have already done what most people try to chase with their night lives. Then what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny, let&#8217;s segregate the invest to match the market fund with the invest to beat the market fund. Though I don&#8217;t recall exactly which replies of yours indicated such, but I believe that you advocated the same approach &#8212; have the vast majority of your funds in a sensible portfolio with asset allocation based on some sensible asset allocation such as the permanent portfolio or the couch potato portfolio. The invest to beat the market portfolio should be invested based on your ability to identify alpha, however that is achieved through fundamental analysis or through technical or statistical analysis. Heck, if everybody subscribed to the strong form of EMH, then security prices wouldn&#8217;t move much.</p>
<p>The ability and the time required to identify alpha through fundamental analysis, unfortunately, is not trivial. To analyze a single small-cap company from scratch based on financial statements takes the order of double to low triple digit hours. You can do this as full-time employment, but to do this as a side job would yield perhaps two investment opportunities every two months, and that&#8217;s only if you diligently applied yourself outside of work by putting in an extra 20 hours every week,and if the market eventually catches up with your assessment, and if your investment portfolio can sustain the draw downs while the market makes up its mind about your ability to identify alpha.</p>
<p>The thing with most small businesses is that they are not portable, and they require quite a bit of marketing, two traits that make them not suitable for a wannabe nomad. The first is self explanatory enough. The second means that instead of just kissing one miserable boss&#8217;s ass, now you have to kiss everyone&#8217;s ass because public opinion has a real impact on your business&#8217;s ability to prosper. </p>
<p>For me, the second part of the portfolio is both an intellectual pursuit and a way to generate some spending money. I can retire now on the first part of my portfolio, but realistically, what the heck am I going to do all day lying in a hammock on a beach? While I&#8217;m 100% certain that the first 6 months of lying in a hammock will be pure bliss, I&#8217;m not so sure about what will happen after the first 6 months. I gave early retirement a try 4 years ago by taking off for 4 months. I can say without reservation that the day I walked out of work, I felt about 20 pounds lighter simply because all the deadlines, all the politics, and all the BS became meaningless to me, but after about 6 weeks of sitting around, despite spending 4 hours a day studying for the CFA, I still felt that I wasn&#8217;t entirely fulfilled despite having the MBA to look forward to by the autumn of that year.</p>
<p>That experiment got me thinking what will I do if I were to take early retirement. Yes, chasing multiples of Asian female hotness will take up 4 hours a day for sure. Heck, just swapping SIM cards to manage the multiples of Asian girlfriends will take an hour, but what about the rest of the the day? Work out at the gym for 2-3 hours, get a massage to relax the overworked muscles, one hour. OK, I guess that is a full work day. Then by the the time evening rolled around, I have already done what most people try to chase with their night lives. Then what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-47403</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-47403</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s better to buy stocks based on sound principles of value investing. Buy  stocks of established companies that have a sound business model, sufficient capital, market share, and spend less transaction cost and observe those other principles described by Warren Buffett. You should be able to beat the market by following his principles, because by definition the average stocks in the index should have less sound business model, capital, etc. So by looking at these criteria you can hope to become relatively better than the &#039;average&#039;. But can you hope to become James Simons or George Soros? You must remember that there are only one Simons and one Soros. If you can become like them just by obtaining CFA, MBA, or PhD, then the finance professors in the top business school would have all become fund managers. So, do spend some time to learn a little about investing so that you can invest yourself. By so doing there are 2 basic advantages. First, you save on annual fees. Second, you have more flexible asset allocation. Stocks funds must be invested in stocks even if stocks are priced too high. Balanced funds must be invested in a proportion like 40% bond and 60% stocks even if one of them is priced too high. By understanding how to price assets, you can do the allocation yourself. Investing should not become the second business. It should ideally be your passive income. If you have time aside from your main employment, consider to start a business. Do things you are most familiar with. For example, if you are familiar with food, then you might start a food business. Don&#039;t do things that you don&#039;t understand. You must search your knowledge bank and find out what you or your spouse have specialised knowledge in that should give you an edge over the average competitor in the industry. Are you good in making cookies, frying rice, selling computers or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s better to buy stocks based on sound principles of value investing. Buy  stocks of established companies that have a sound business model, sufficient capital, market share, and spend less transaction cost and observe those other principles described by Warren Buffett. You should be able to beat the market by following his principles, because by definition the average stocks in the index should have less sound business model, capital, etc. So by looking at these criteria you can hope to become relatively better than the &#8216;average&#8217;. But can you hope to become James Simons or George Soros? You must remember that there are only one Simons and one Soros. If you can become like them just by obtaining CFA, MBA, or PhD, then the finance professors in the top business school would have all become fund managers. So, do spend some time to learn a little about investing so that you can invest yourself. By so doing there are 2 basic advantages. First, you save on annual fees. Second, you have more flexible asset allocation. Stocks funds must be invested in stocks even if stocks are priced too high. Balanced funds must be invested in a proportion like 40% bond and 60% stocks even if one of them is priced too high. By understanding how to price assets, you can do the allocation yourself. Investing should not become the second business. It should ideally be your passive income. If you have time aside from your main employment, consider to start a business. Do things you are most familiar with. For example, if you are familiar with food, then you might start a food business. Don&#8217;t do things that you don&#8217;t understand. You must search your knowledge bank and find out what you or your spouse have specialised knowledge in that should give you an edge over the average competitor in the industry. Are you good in making cookies, frying rice, selling computers or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickW</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-47398</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-47398</guid>
		<description>Creating that second stream of income is not easy if you are already working a full-time job. You basically have to be willing to put in 60+ hours a week for a few years in a row unless your day job is so relaxed that you can sit at your desk and do other things. Most professional jobs don&#039;t come with that luxury, and the ones that do means your pretty much being put out to pasture. 

Still, I would recommend at least trying to develop that second source of income because otherwise you end up wasting a lot of time watching TV anyways.

As for trading for profit, it&#039;s not easy. Even with an MBA and CFA and the ability to program in C++, C, Tcl, and Perl, none of my automated trading algorithms have consistently been successful even in back tests. Still, I have been at it for only a few months, so I can see that the problem space is defined, so it&#039;s just a matter of writing more code to anticipate the possible variations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating that second stream of income is not easy if you are already working a full-time job. You basically have to be willing to put in 60+ hours a week for a few years in a row unless your day job is so relaxed that you can sit at your desk and do other things. Most professional jobs don&#8217;t come with that luxury, and the ones that do means your pretty much being put out to pasture. </p>
<p>Still, I would recommend at least trying to develop that second source of income because otherwise you end up wasting a lot of time watching TV anyways.</p>
<p>As for trading for profit, it&#8217;s not easy. Even with an MBA and CFA and the ability to program in C++, C, Tcl, and Perl, none of my automated trading algorithms have consistently been successful even in back tests. Still, I have been at it for only a few months, so I can see that the problem space is defined, so it&#8217;s just a matter of writing more code to anticipate the possible variations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-46042</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-46042</guid>
		<description>If you must try your luck in options, then have two portfolios. One that you use to invest in the traditional stocks, bonds and property which, even without help of lady luck, could lead to retirement within a time-frame of 10-20 years. Then, have a separate account of money you can afford to lose fully. Play with it but do not expect to make a profit from it. You may, if you are lucky, though. As I said, this is a zero-sum game, so if you are not the unlucky guy, you may well make some money from it. But whatever you do with this account, your retirement is not jeopardized because your main portfolio in stocks, bonds and property will still lead you to retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you must try your luck in options, then have two portfolios. One that you use to invest in the traditional stocks, bonds and property which, even without help of lady luck, could lead to retirement within a time-frame of 10-20 years. Then, have a separate account of money you can afford to lose fully. Play with it but do not expect to make a profit from it. You may, if you are lucky, though. As I said, this is a zero-sum game, so if you are not the unlucky guy, you may well make some money from it. But whatever you do with this account, your retirement is not jeopardized because your main portfolio in stocks, bonds and property will still lead you to retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-46041</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-46041</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tonay Chai&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Sunny&lt;/strong&gt; - yes, I know, Mr Chiang is maybe the wrong example; still the fact remains, that options work for a lot of people. If you think it&#039;s a way for you, try it out with monopoly money and a passive account before you jump into the water swimming with the real sharks.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tonay Chai</strong> and <strong>Sunny</strong> &#8211; yes, I know, Mr Chiang is maybe the wrong example; still the fact remains, that options work for a lot of people. If you think it&#8217;s a way for you, try it out with monopoly money and a passive account before you jump into the water swimming with the real sharks.  <img src="http://www.nomad4ever.com/wp-includes/images/yahoo/yahoo3.gif" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chai</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-46036</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-46036</guid>
		<description>Hi folks :

I thought this Freely matter thing has settled and now it surfaced again :) I think among all the Freely batches of graduates, I might be the stubborn one who has hang on to this earnings gapping strategy the longest, about 4 years to be exact. 

All the refining, analysis, delving into this techniques leads me to this advice - please give it up. 

However, if you want to risk a bit of your spare money to &quot;buy an option lottery ticket&quot; in the hope to strike 200% or more profit from an earnings announcement event, then this is the &quot;perfect&quot; technique to pump up your adrenaline. But this technique is so close to gambling that I&#039;m sure you know very well that you can&#039;t earn a consistent monthly income from gambling. 

If you&#039;re into forex or index futures trading, I believe your experiences would have &quot;taught&quot; you to be cautious about entering a trade before a major economic report announcement. This is mainly because prices would gyrate wildly after the announcement; and the worst is, you won&#039;t know which direction the price would go to. To top it, prices would sometimes shoot up when poor announcement came out. And that&#039;s exactly the same bullet biting scenario when you trade with earnings gapping. 

So for newbies out there who want to learn options trading, avoid this earnings gapping technique entirely. There are other options trading techniques which are far more sensible and less risky than this technique, that is, if you practise the good discipline in money management (the psychology aspect in trading) &amp; the acquire the good skills in risks management (the technical aspect in trading).

Regards,

Tony Chai     :)) :)) :)) :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks :</p>
<p>I thought this Freely matter thing has settled and now it surfaced again <img src="http://www.nomad4ever.com/wp-includes/images/yahoo/yahoo1.gif" class="wp-smiley" /> I think among all the Freely batches of graduates, I might be the stubborn one who has hang on to this earnings gapping strategy the longest, about 4 years to be exact. </p>
<p>All the refining, analysis, delving into this techniques leads me to this advice &#8211; please give it up. </p>
<p>However, if you want to risk a bit of your spare money to &#8220;buy an option lottery ticket&#8221; in the hope to strike 200% or more profit from an earnings announcement event, then this is the &#8220;perfect&#8221; technique to pump up your adrenaline. But this technique is so close to gambling that I&#8217;m sure you know very well that you can&#8217;t earn a consistent monthly income from gambling. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re into forex or index futures trading, I believe your experiences would have &#8220;taught&#8221; you to be cautious about entering a trade before a major economic report announcement. This is mainly because prices would gyrate wildly after the announcement; and the worst is, you won&#8217;t know which direction the price would go to. To top it, prices would sometimes shoot up when poor announcement came out. And that&#8217;s exactly the same bullet biting scenario when you trade with earnings gapping. </p>
<p>So for newbies out there who want to learn options trading, avoid this earnings gapping technique entirely. There are other options trading techniques which are far more sensible and less risky than this technique, that is, if you practise the good discipline in money management (the psychology aspect in trading) &amp; the acquire the good skills in risks management (the technical aspect in trading).</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Tony Chai     <img src="http://www.nomad4ever.com/wp-includes/images/yahoo/21.gif" class="wp-smiley" /> <img src="http://www.nomad4ever.com/wp-includes/images/yahoo/21.gif" class="wp-smiley" /> <img src="http://www.nomad4ever.com/wp-includes/images/yahoo/21.gif" class="wp-smiley" /> <img src="http://www.nomad4ever.com/wp-includes/images/yahoo/21.gif" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.nomad4ever.com/2006/08/27/having-only-one-income-stream-is-not-enough/#comment-46034</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomad4ever.com/?p=21#comment-46034</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
I think your intention and suggestion are good. It&#039;s in fact necessary to at least 2 streams of income so that one may one day survive on his non-linear income. But your example is a bad one. This Mr Chiang holds an unaccredited PhD, and his method is not a reliable way for most people to gain financial independence. Options investing is a zero sum game. When there is a winner on one end of the trade (eg. the writer of the option), there must be a loser on the other end (eg. the buyer of the option). So, wealth cannot be created for the buyers and sellers of the options. Only the brokers who earn a commission, and the tax-collector who taxes the brokers may become better off. 

Investing in stocks, bonds and property are more reliable ways to grow one&#039;s wealth. When one invests in a stock, he provides the capital for the company whose stock he buys to expand the business, thereby creating wealth. When one invests in a bond, he provides the government or company with the capital to build bridges, factories, etc., thereby creating wealth. When one builds, buys and rents a property he provides a office, accommodation and shop space for people to use, thereby enabling the economic activities of the later, which creates wealth.

But what about options? They don&#039;t. They are supposed to be hedging tools for risks management. They don&#039;t create wealth (beside for Uncle Sam and the brokers).

Hence, I would suggest that a better example to follow is not Mr Chiang who doesn&#039;t deserve the &#039;Dr&#039; title since his PhD is unaccredited, but a down-to-earth book such as &quot;The Millionaire Next Door&quot; written by Dr Thomas Stanley who holds an accredited PhD whose findings are backed with solid research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
I think your intention and suggestion are good. It&#8217;s in fact necessary to at least 2 streams of income so that one may one day survive on his non-linear income. But your example is a bad one. This Mr Chiang holds an unaccredited PhD, and his method is not a reliable way for most people to gain financial independence. Options investing is a zero sum game. When there is a winner on one end of the trade (eg. the writer of the option), there must be a loser on the other end (eg. the buyer of the option). So, wealth cannot be created for the buyers and sellers of the options. Only the brokers who earn a commission, and the tax-collector who taxes the brokers may become better off. </p>
<p>Investing in stocks, bonds and property are more reliable ways to grow one&#8217;s wealth. When one invests in a stock, he provides the capital for the company whose stock he buys to expand the business, thereby creating wealth. When one invests in a bond, he provides the government or company with the capital to build bridges, factories, etc., thereby creating wealth. When one builds, buys and rents a property he provides a office, accommodation and shop space for people to use, thereby enabling the economic activities of the later, which creates wealth.</p>
<p>But what about options? They don&#8217;t. They are supposed to be hedging tools for risks management. They don&#8217;t create wealth (beside for Uncle Sam and the brokers).</p>
<p>Hence, I would suggest that a better example to follow is not Mr Chiang who doesn&#8217;t deserve the &#8216;Dr&#8217; title since his PhD is unaccredited, but a down-to-earth book such as &#8220;The Millionaire Next Door&#8221; written by Dr Thomas Stanley who holds an accredited PhD whose findings are backed with solid research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

